You can use it too, but we suggest you first think carefully about whether this license or the ordinary general public license is the better. Why you shouldnt use the lesser gpl for your next library. The lgpl basically requires read the full license and faq for details you mention that it is licensed under the lgpl, with reference to the full. This license is a set of additional permissions added to version 3 of the gnu general public license. Lesser general public license is sometimes referred to as library gpl or gnu libraries, and some associate it with the idea of. This is a little inconvenient for the customer and you, but it keeps things separate. Nomad nonlinear optimization by mesh adaptive direct search. Sony mobile offers to provide source code of software licensed under the gpl or lgpl or. Lgpllicensed libraries can be linked with nongpl licensed programs, including proprietary software. Why should i use the gnu gpl rather than other free software licenses. The fact that cgal is open source software does not. Dual licensed packages in the fpclazarus distributions.
Can i link a gpl program with a proprietary system library. If you releasedistribute software using lgpld libraries, your software doesnt need to be covered by the gpl, but the libraries must retain the lgpl. The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the lgpl into their own even proprietary software without being required by the terms of a strong copyleft license to release the source code of their own components. Most gnu software packages use the gnu gpl, but there are a few gnu programs and parts of programs that use looser licenses, such as the lesser gpl. From version 5, we have changed the license from lgpl to polyform noncommercial 1. Modification of lgpld components suggests contribution back to the creatormaintainer. The free software foundation recommends taking the additional step of adding a boilerplate notice to the top of each file. In contrast to lgpl, gpl requires that you provide the code for all changes made to the software. I recently went through some involved discussions with a client who has traditionally not used opensource software when a library package licensed under the gnu lesser general public license lgpl seemed to be the best choice for our needs. Can i use an lgpllicenced library in my commercial app. Originally lgpl was read out as library general public license. Open source licenses are licenses that comply with the open source definition in brief, they allow software to be freely used, modified, and shared.
For more information about how to release your own software under this license, please see our page of instructions. See how to choose a license for your own work for general recommendations about choosing a license for your work the gnu project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. Among the two gpl is the basis of open source software for programmers. Contrast this with the licensing of most commercial software packages, where you are allowed to load the software on a single computer, are allowed to make no copies, and never see the source code. The gnu project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. Gnu lesser general public license, otherwise known as lgpl, is more or less, an amended version of gpl. You can distribute your application using a gpl library commercially, but you must also provide the source code. It would be good if the r core team, as well as people releasing packages, were clearer about the proper use of the software, as they see it. If i understand it correctly, if we use a secret message format that we dont explain to anyone we could. Applying lgpl to a library ensures that the library itself and any modified versions of it will remain open source.
The lgpl license explicitly allows such usages of librariespackages released under that license. Free software in this sense is software which you are free to use, copy, modify, redistribute, with no limit. I kept a number of notes during these conversations and felt it was probably something that should be. Revised versions of the gnu lesser general public license. Hi, using a gpl licensed package in a commercial product should not be a problem, right. The gpllgpl compability of the official distribution is self imposed only to make licensing of the main distribution consistent. Most of these opinions were formed in discussions on the debianlegal mailing list in response to questions from potential package maintainers or licensors. This allows nonfree programs to gain access or link to the library. The cygwin api library found in the winsup subdirectory of the source code is covered by the gnu lesser general public license lgpl version 3 or later. If i understand it correctly, if we use a secret message format that we dont explain to anyone we. In this section we explain the essence of the different licenses, as well as the rationale why we have chosen them. Im not clear on how that affects your products licensing.
The problems are defined in terms of their variational formulation and can be easily implemented using freefem language. The gnu lesser general public license lgpl is a freesoftware license published by the free software foundation fsf. Can you use software under mit licence for commercial use. The lgpl and gpl licenses differ with one major exception. When using an lgpl library package like pyside2, your obligations are. When using an lgpl librarypackage like pyside2, your obligations are. Gpl, also known as copyleft, grants permission to reuse or modify the source code to make derivative works, but if you distribute your program to others, it requires you to license your derivative work under the gpl too. The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the lgpl into their own even proprietary software without being required by the terms of a strong copyleft license to release the source code of their own.
Recipients may choose the terms under which they are want to use or distribute the software, when all the preconditions of a chosen license are satisfied. The lgpl license allows an application that references the binaries to remain closedsource. You may copy, distribute and modify the software as long as you track changesdates of in source files and keep modifications under gpl. Insert the word lesser before general in all three places in the boilerplate notice to make sure that you refer to the gnu lgplv3 and not the gnu gplv3. The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the lgpl into their own even proprietary software without being required by. The difference between the gpl and the lgpl is that with the lgpl, the entire work doesnt have to have the same license. Moving to the issue of source publication, that is specifically, deliberately removed under lgpl lesser gpl, providing certain conditions are.
Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu project. As long as were not linking directly towards the package, but rather just send or receive messages from it, that is. Lesser gpl permits use of the library in proprietary programs. In a nutshell, the idea of lgpld projects usually libraries is that you are free to use them as you wish in your own application, be it open or closed source, free or proprietary as long as you publish the source code of the lgpld part if you modify the lgpld part, you must publish the modified sources, under lgpl additionally, the libraries must be linked dynamically so that. The lgpl provides an alternative license that preserves many of the benefits of the gpl model for such librariesin fact, the lesser general public license was in its first incarnation known as the library general public license. Hangfire software is an opensource software that is multilicensed under the terms of the licenses listed in this article. Users choosing to use cgal under the freeofcharge open source license have to comply to its terms, otherwise they have to buy a commercial license. This license, the lesser general public license, applies to some specially designated software packagestypically librariesof the free software foundation and other authors who decide to use it. So a futre consumer product licensing opensource software under gplv3 could not be protected in this way against device vulnerability. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is a series of widely used free software licenses that guarantee end users the freedom to run, study, share, and modify the software. How can i legally use lgpl javascript in a commercial web site.
Over 10% of python packages on pypi are distributed. Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu. Why the gpl is incompatible with commercial software. The majority of packages on pypi, 64%, use a permissive license, such as the mit, apache 2. You can sell your commercial software under its own licence and not ship it with the gpl addons. It would be even better if the license would change. I assume they mean lesser as in less strong in forcing software to be open source. Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files the software, to deal in the software without restriction, including wit. The lgpl license explicitly allows such usages of libraries packages released under that license. Proprietary software developers have the advantage of money. The boilerplate can be found at the end of the gnu gplv3 license.
It ought not force us to release all our own software in the product under the gpl. This is a list of software packages that implement the finite element method for solving partial differential equations. The creative commons attributionsharealike international license version 4. For details of the requirements of lgplv3, please read the gnu lesser general public license lgpl. At least by adding an exception, reducing it to an lgpl or best permissive license. This license is generally limited to software libraries. Using gpl licensed packages in a commercial product ros. It is called lesser general public license because it provides less protection to the users freedom. As said before, some packages like sdl are kindly duallicensed by their original authors. Freefem is a free and opensource parallel fea software for multiphysics simulations. A lesser general public license is used to license free software so that it can be incorporated into both free software and proprietary software, and is often referred to as the weaker sibling of gpl. Distribution of programs released under the gnu licenses.
By contrast, libraries licensed under the gnu lesser general public license lgpl may be linked to proprietary applications. In combination with the polyform noncommercial license we sell licenses for customers who use epplus in a commercial business. If a library is released under the gpl not the lgpl, does that mean that any software which uses it has to be under the gpl. Originally, lgpl was read out as library general public license. Such new versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to address new problems or concerns.
It has now been reinterpreted to be read out as the lesser general public license. List of finite element software packages wikipedia. Paraview uses a permissive bsd license that enables the broadest possible audience, including commercial organizations, to use the software, royalty free, for most purposes. Differences between gpl and lgpl when using licensed software. Cgal is distributed under a dual license scheme, that is under the gpl lgpl open source license, as well as under commercial licenses cgal consists of different parts covered by different open source licenses. The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a computer program the rights of the.
There is written in lgpl license that i can use not modified, linked code in commercial, closed product without changing license of product to lgpl. Describes the ability to use the software for commercial purposes. This page presents the opinion of some debianlegal contributors on how certain licenses follow the debian free software guidelines dfsg. Sony mobile offers to provide source code of software licensed under the gpl or lgpl or some other open source licenses allowing source code distribution to you on a. In addition, there are other licenses that are applicable because of other packages leveraged by paraview or developed by collaborators. Does using the gpl for a program make it gnu software. Using python module on lgpl license in commercial product closed there is written in lgpl license that i can use not modified, linked code in commercial, closed product without changing license of product to lgpl. A special case of internal software is web based products. Why you shouldnt use the lesser gpl for your next library gnu. A lesser general public license lgpl is a license for opensource software that allows for provisions for including elements of free software in either free or proprietary software. Using python module on lgpl license in commercial product.
1397 999 181 1336 270 430 530 527 1519 1505 1319 209 213 1199 489 766 1412 504 1567 820 1654 131 239 947 589 1607 1493 842 1016 83 603 1083 1231 1360